arisuchan    [ tech / cult / art ]   [ λ / Δ ]   [ psy ]   [ ru ]   [ random ]   [ meta ]   [ all ]    info / stickers     temporarily disabledtemporarily disabled

/z/ - zaibatsu — finance and economics

business. markets. international relations. geopolitics. sociology.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment

formatting options

File
Password (For file deletion.)

Help me fix this shit. https://archive.arisuchan.jp/q/res/2703.html#2703

Kalyx ######


File: 1556275806150.jpg (9.26 KB, 300x168, yotsugi.jpg)

 No.473

 No.477

Get fucked Mikee

 No.543

>>477
Be more specific.

And how do you know I'm this """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"Mikee"""""""""

 No.544

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8317#comment-2238862 (Archive link: http://archive.fo/emkVd )
A commentator asked on Eric S. Raymond's website:

>ESR: Eben Moglen suggested that he was going to write a paper refuting the notion that "The GPL is revocable":

>
>>I think the best procedure would be for me to publish my analysis and
>>for you then to tell me what is wrong with it.
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/26/718
>
>Why has no such paper from him materialized?


ESR response was shocking, blunt, and to the point:
>esr on 2019-05-30 at 08:08:23 said:
>
>>Why has no such paper from him materialized?
>
>Because Moglen is either wrong about or deliberately misrepresenting the law and the "revokists" have it right. Thank you, I had already figured this out from his (non)responses on lkml.




https://slashdot.org/submission/9760958/esr-revokists-have-it-right


https://slashdot.org/submission/9770756/eric-s-raymond-gplrevokists-have-it-right



[Return] [Go to top] [ Catalog ] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]